Case Studies
Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM10
Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM10
ProductTitanium Alloy   ** Housing
Critical   Requirements±0.005mm dimensional   tolerance, Ra 0.4μm surface finish
Issue ObservedTool breakage and   accelerated flank wear during deep cavity milling (depth >50mm)
Symptoms# 47% increase in tool replacement   frequency  
# Surface roughness degradation to Ra 0.8-1.2μm
# Thermal deformation causing 0.007-0.012mm dimensional drift 
Root Cause AnalysisMaterial Factors:
# Ti-6Al-4V's low thermal conductivity (6.7 W/m·K) caused heat   concentration
# Work hardening tendency during interrupted cutting
Process Limitations:
# Conventional flood coolant couldn't reach deep cutting zones
# Fixed RPM (1800) and feed rate (150 mm/min) induced harmonic   vibration
Implemented   SolutionsTooling Optimization:
# Adopted variable-pitch solid carbide end mills (5-flute, AlTiN   coating)
# Implemented trochoidal milling path to reduce radial engagement
Parameter Adjustment:
# Reduced cutting speed from 120 m/min → 95 m/min
# Increased feed per tooth from 0.08 mm/z → 0.12 mm/z
# Introduced pulsed coolant delivery at 8 bar pressure
Fixture Enhancement:
# Designed conformal cooling channels in vacuum fixture
# Added vibration-damping composite pads
Lessons Learned# High-frequency spindle analysis   (>20kHz sampling rate) effectively detects micro-chatter
# Titanium alloys require ≤35% radial engagement in deep-pocket   machining
# Hybrid MQL + cryogenic cooling shows promise for next-phase   optimization


Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM9
Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM9
Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM8
Mandrel Manufacturing for a Large OEM8